QA/NewStorage
Revision History
This section describes the modifications that have been made to this wiki page. A new row has been completed each time the content of this document is updated (small corrections for typographical errors do not need to be recorded). The description of the modification contains the differences from the prior version, in terms of what sections were updated and to what extent.
| Date | Version | Author | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2017 | 1.0 | Roxana Leitan | Created first draft |
Contents
Overview
Websites with Storage API can ask for permissions of storing persistent data. The permission is like the tape on the sealed box so that data stored in the box won't be automatically removed until the user manually make changes in preferences.
Purpose
Detail the purpose of this document. For example:
- The test scope, focus areas and objectives
- The test responsibilities
- The test strategy for the levels and types of test for this release
- The entry and exit criteria
- The basis of the test estimates
- Any risks, issues, assumptions and test dependencies
- The test schedule and major milestones
- The test deliverables
Scope
This wiki details the testing that will be performed by the project team for the New Storage project. It defines the overall testing requirements and provides an integrated view of the project test activities. Its purpose is to document:
- What will be tested
- How testing will be performed
Ownership
Development
DOM Engineers:
Shawn Huang (irc: shawnjohnjr)
Tom Tung (irc: tt)
UX designer:
Mark Liang (irc: mark_liang)
Morpheus Chen (irc: Morpheus)
Tina Hsieh (irc: Tina_Hsieh)
FE Engineers: Fischer Liu (irc: fischer)
EPM: Francis Lee
Engineering QA Team - Nightly Testing:
Rares Bologa (irc: RaresB) - PM for QA team
Brandusa Tot (irc: brindusat) - leading QA efforts
Roxana Leitan (irc: RoxanaLeitan) - QA
Desktop QA Team - Beta Testing:
Andrei Vaida (irc: avaida) - PM for the QA team
Ciprian Georgiu (irc: ciprian_georgiu) - leading QA efforts
Emil Ghitta (irc: emilghitta) - leading QA efforts
Platform QA Team :
Cristian Chiorean (irc: cchiorean) - PM for QA team
Andrei Filip -leading QA efforts
Ionut Budeanu - QA
Testing summary
Scope of Testing
In Scope
- Permission
- Full Disk
- Preferences
- Changing Status
- Removing Data
Out of Scope
Following areas/features are considered out of scope and will not be considered as testing zones to be handled in this test plan.
Requirements for testing
Environments
Full testing will be performed on the following OSes:
- Windows
- Windows 10
- Windows 7
- Mac OS X
- Ubuntu
Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups
Nightly
Currently the two preferences that enable New Storage are set as default on Nightly 55:
- "dom.storageManager.enabled" - true
- "browser.storageManager.enabled" - true
- browser.storageManager.pressureNotification.usageThresholdGB
- Default is 5
- browser.storageManager.pressureNotification.usageThresholdGB
- Default is 1200000
Beta
text
Post Beta / Release
text
Test Strategy
Risk Assessment and Coverage
| ID | Description / Threat Description | Covered by Test Objective | Magnitude | Probability | Priority | Impact Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAC-1 | User Experience | TO-1 | 3-High | 1-Unlikely | 2-Medium | 6 |
| RAC-2 | Preferences options | TO-2 | 3-High | 2-Possible | 3-High | 18 |
| RAC-3 | Permission prompt | TO-3 | 2-Moderate | 2-Possible | 2-Medium | 8 |
| RAC-4 | Full disk | TO-4 | 3-High | 3-Almost Certain | 3-High | 27 |
| RAC-5 | Accesibility | TO-5 | 1-Low | 2-Possible | 3-High | 6 |
| RAC-6 | RTL | TO-6 | 1-Low | 3-Almost Certain | 2-Medium | 4 |
Values:
- Magnitude: 1- Low , 2-Moderate, 3-High
- Probability: 1-Unlikely, 2-Possible, 3-Almost Certain
- Priority: 1 - Low, 2-Medium, 3-High
Impact Score Breakdown:
- An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
- An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
- An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.
Test Objectives
This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.
| Ref | Function | Test Objective | Evaluation Criteria | Test Type | RAC | Owners |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Usability | To ensure a positive user experience | User Experience expectations | Manual | RAC-1, RAC-2, RAC-3, RAC-5 | Eng Team |
| 2 | Preferences | To verify the existing options of Offline Web Content and User Data | The User Data is stored/removed according options | Manual | RAC-2 | Eng Team |
| 3 | Permisions | To verify the permission pop-ups and basic functions(Allow, Don't Allow) | The permissions options work properly | Manual | RAC-3 | Eng Team |
| 4 | Full Disk Warning | To verify full disk notification bars | The notification bars are displayed accordingly | Manual | RAC-4 | Eng Team |
| 5 | Accesibility | To verify accesibility pre-requisites: colors, mouse only, keyboard only, screen reader | New Storage options are usable from accessibility point of view | Manual | RAC-5 | Eng Team |
| 6 | Localization | New Storage options are properly displayed on locale builds | RTL and strings in general (contextual warning) | Manual | RAC-6 | Eng Team |
Builds
This section should contain links for builds with the feature -New Storage enabled
- Links for Nightly builds
- Links for Beta builds
Test Execution Schedule
The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.
| Project phase | Start Date | End Date |
|---|---|---|
| Start project | 2017.03.28 | |
| Study documentation/specs received from developers | 2017.03.28 | |
| QA - Test plan creation | 2017.03.28 | |
| QA - Test cases/Env preparation | 2017.04.20 | |
| QA - Nightly Testing | ||
| QA - Beta Testing | ||
| Release Date |
Testing Tools
Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:
| Process | Tool |
|---|---|
| Test plan creation | Mozilla wiki |
| Test case creation | TestRail/ Google docs |
| Test case execution | TestRail |
| Bugs management | Bugzilla |
Status
Overview
Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta
References
- Meta bug Bug 1147820 [meta Improve Storage]
- List and links for specs
-UX specifications -link -Storage specifications -link
Testcases
Test Areas
| Test Areas | Covered | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Private Window | Yes | |
| Multi-Process Enabled | Yes | |
| Multi-process Disabled | Yes | |
| Theme (high contrast) | Yes | |
| UI | ||
| Mouse-only operation | Yes | |
| Keyboard-only operation | Yes | |
| Display (HiDPI) | Yes | |
| Interaction (scroll, zoom) | Yes | |
| Usable with a screen reader | Yes | e.g. with NVDA |
| Usability and/or discoverability testing | Yes | Is this feature user friendly |
| RTL build testing | Yes | |
| Help/Support | ||
| Help/support interface required | Yes | Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable. |
| Support documents planned(written) | Yes | Make sure support documents are written and are correct. |
| Install/Upgrade | ||
| Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected | No | |
| Does sync work across upgrades | No | |
| Requires install testing | No | separate feature/application installation needed (not only Firefox) |
| Affects first-run or onboarding | No | Florin/Lawrence are investigating if there is a dedicated QA for this, or we should test? Should be an yes/no and if is yes should add in detail column the team/person assigned. |
| Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing | No | yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing |
| Enterprise | Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds | |
| Enterprise administration | No | |
| Network proxies/autoconfig | No | |
| ESR behavior changes | No | |
| Locked preferences | No | |
| Data Monitoring | ||
| Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring | No | List of error conditions to monitor |
| Telemetry correctness testing | No | |
| Server integration testing | No | |
| Offline and server failure testing | No | |
| Load testing | No | |
| Add-ons | If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on. | |
| Addon API required? | Yes | |
| Comprehensive API testing | Yes | |
| Permissions | ||
| Testing with existing/popular addons | ||
| Security | Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature. | |
| 3rd-party security review | ||
| Privilege escalation testing | ||
| Fuzzing | ||
| Web Compatibility | depends on the feature | |
| Testing against target sites | Yes | |
| Survey of many sites for compatibility | Yes | |
| Interoperability | depends on the feature | |
| Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers. | No | |
| Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS | No | |
| Interaction of this feature with other browser features | No |
Test suite
Full Test suite - Link to test rail - test cases should be added under Firefox Desktop project link Smoke Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed. Regression Test suite - Link with the tests - if available/needed.
Bug Work
Meta bug: 1147820 - [meta Improve Storage]
Logged bugs ( blocking 1147820 )
37 Total; 10 Open (27.03%); 24 Resolved (64.86%); 3 Verified (8.11%);
Bug fix verification
13 Total; 0 Open (0%); 10 Resolved (76.92%); 3 Verified (23.08%);
Sign off
Criteria
Checklist
- All test cases should be executed
- Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
- All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)
Results
Nightly testing
List of OSes that will be covered by testing
- Link for the tests run
- Full Test suite, link to TestRail - Tests Runs and Results link
- Daily Smoke, if needed/available
- Regression Test suite, if needed/available
Merge to Beta Sign-off
List of OSes that will be covered by testing
- Link for the tests run
- Full Test suite
Checklist
| Exit Criteria | Status | Notes/Details |
|---|---|---|
| Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases) | ||
| Testing Infrastructure setup | ||
| Test Plan Creation | Yes | |
| Test Cases Creation | Yes | |
| Full Functional Tests Execution | ||
| Automation Coverage | ||
| Performance Testing | ||
| All Defects Logged | ||
| Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified | ||
| Metrics/Telemetry | ||
| QA Signoff - Nightly Release | GREEN (signed off on 9/13/2017) | |
| QA Signoff - Beta Release | GREEN (signed off on 10/27/2017) |
