Calendar:QA Chat:2006-04-05:Log
From MozillaWiki
[11:24] ctalbert We'll be starting the QA Chat in about 7 minues [11:24] ctalbert minutes [11:35] ctalbert Ok. We'll start the QA Chat now. I'm in another defect review meeting at the moment. [11:35] ctalbert So my responses will be a little slow. [11:36] ctalbert We will do a Test Day next Tuesday, I will post that on the blog at the moment. [11:36] ctalbert in a moment [11:37] ctalbert We have a bunch of testing ideas on the calendar TODO list, so if folks have time, please have a look there. [11:38] ctalbert Ok. Here is the URL for the QA Discussion needed bugs: http://tinyurl.com/yhwge4 [11:40] ctalbert So the first bug is bug 283497 [11:40] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283497 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, calendar should use the toolkit's datetimepicker controls [11:42] ctalbert I think that mschroeder was probably wondering if we could CONFIRM this bug since jminta and mvl have said that it is a valid bug. I'll set it to a CONFIRMED state. [11:42] ctalbert bug 300470 is next [11:42] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300470 cri, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, published calendar events randomly dissappear. No valid reason and no info in log files [11:44] bbbrowning smells to me like your usual shared-ICS issue, though it's hard to be sure [11:46] ctalbert yes, there is quite a bit of discussion in there, I think it's on the list because folks think it might be WFM or a dupe of existing bugs [11:47] ctalbert I'll have to look at it in more detail after the meeting. [11:48] ctalbert bbbrowning: Since you're here, I'd like to skip down to bug 371753. What do you think we should do here? [11:48] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371753 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Url Authentication [11:48] bbbrowning we relnote 329570 which to my eye is the same thing [11:50] bbbrowning wrt 371753, I'm not sure [11:50] bbbrowning I just don't see a bug there. maybe I'm blind. [11:51] bbbrowning but clearly Lionel's understanding of http basic auth is different from mine (and Andrew's, I think) [11:51] ctalbert Ok. I'll look at it again after the other meeting I'm in is over and see if I can write something to convince Lionel that his problem is reported elsewhere and we will try to close 371753 [11:52] bbbrowning thanks ... [11:53] ctalbert What about bug 366860? [11:53] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366860 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, error when creating remote calendar [11:54] bbbrowning well, my opinion is that it should be closed (by someone other than me) [11:54] ctalbert I think we can mark this one as a dupe of the "better error handling" bug [11:55] ctalbert or invalid [11:55] bbbrowning probably should have marked it qawanted rather than for discussion [11:56] bbbrowning probably invalid since the error is being reported (though not always understood!) [11:58] ctalbert I think we can dupe this one against bug 374566 [11:58] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374566 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, CalDAV provider should provide UI when setting calendar read-only [11:59] ctalbert brb, sorry. [12:00] bbbrowning I suppose, if only to close it. The patch in 374566 just makes the same error that Omar saw appear in an alert (localized) instead of the jscript console [12:01] bbbrowning but if it closes the bug I'm good with it. [12:02] ctalbert I think that is what they wanted, something more understandable to the end user. And a localized alert woudl do the trick (at least that's my reading of the bug) [12:03] ctalbert bug 357151 is next, the OS/2 bug [12:03] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357151 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, event window does not open [12:04] ctalbert Sounds like that one may be fixed, per jminta's comment. We just need to supply this guy with an OS/2 nightly to retest, or have someone build one. [12:04] ctalbert I'll leave it on the list for now to keep it in the radar. [12:05] ctalbert bug 353887 is on the list pending some investigation that has still not happened. So, it stays [12:05] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353887 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Calendar Internal Code has errors when calculating recurrences with all-day and non-allday items [12:05] ctalbert And that brings us to bug 333717, which looks pretty scary [12:05] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333717 maj, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, REOP, Timezone information lost, causing wrong results from recurrence rules [12:06] * bvdbos_ (chatzilla@moz-5D7BB5AB.upc-c.chello.nl) has joined #calendar-qa [12:08] ctalbert Actually that's a rather old bug, and I'm not sure why mschroeder flagged it as "need discussion" [12:08] ctalbert perhaps he was wondering if it could be closed or duped against the "foreign timezone" bug 314339 [12:09] firebot ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314339 nor, P1, Sunbird 0.5, ctalbert.moz@gmail.com, NEW, need to handle non-native timezone bits [12:09] ctalbert I'll have to wait on that and ask him about it. [12:09] ctalbert And that is the QA Discussion Needed list. Are there any other bugs that folks wanted to chat about? [12:14] ctalbert Ok. That sounds like the end of the QA chat then. Remember we will have a test day on next tuesday. I'll be blogging and updating the calendar and what not for it. So stay tuned. [12:14] ctalbert Try to work down the issues on the TODO list if you have time! [12:14] ctalbert Thanks