Calendar:QA Chat:2008-02-28:Log

[18:33] <mschroeder> Let's start the QA chat.
[18:33] <mschroeder> Our agenda for today: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:QA_Chat:2008-02-28
[18:34] <mschroeder> First topic: Next week: Working session/Test day (depending on RC1)
[18:36] <mschroeder> I hope I'll have an internet conncetion next week (changing my ISP), even if ctalbert might tell you something else.
[18:36] <mschroeder> ;)
[18:36] <ctalbert> hah
[18:37] <mschroeder> Andreas: Do you have time to moderate the testday next Thursday?
[18:37] <Andreas> from MET 14:00 to 19:00
[18:38] <Andreas> or a little bit longer.
[18:39] <mschroeder> anyone else here who is also available in the European evening?
[18:40] <thetux> likely from 16:00 till 21:00
[18:40] <mschroeder> thetux: great
[18:41] <mschroeder> I'll write an announement tomorrow assuming we'll have the RC1 by Thursday.
[18:43] <mschroeder> ctalbert: Can you submit it to blog and newsgroups on Tuesday?
[18:45] <ctalbert> Yes, certainly
[18:45] <mschroeder> Looking at our test plan (http://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:QA_Test_Plan_0.8), what should we test? Maybe spotchecks on the locales?
[18:45] <thetux> sounds good
[18:46] <mschroeder> I added a table to the test plan, so you can edit it to put in your test results.
[18:47] <mschroeder> Running Litmus on all OS would also be good.
[18:48] <thetux> i think tomorrow i'll know which OS we have as vmware images
[18:48] <ctalbert> Spotchecks on locales would be really good, especially if we take ause's change
[18:50] <mschroeder> When we have a RC1, sipaq should post to the newegroups that the localizers should test their own locales.
[18:50] <thetux> iTiP should get special attention, too
[18:50] <Andreas> I started with testing the multi language lighning.xpi on Sparc Solaris and X86
[18:51] <mschroeder> thetux: good point
[18:51] <mschroeder> Andreas: awesome
[18:52] <Andreas> No big deal, I started lightning, checked some menues and dialogs
[18:53] <mschroeder> I'll try to add details on how to test specific features to the test plan tomorrow, didn't have time to do this since last Thursday.
[18:53] <thetux> importing should be good tested, hb modified a lot the last days on import pattern for outlook exports
[18:54] <mschroeder> thetux: another good point.
[18:55] <mschroeder> I checked in three additional patches today.
[18:56] <mschroeder> okay. Anything else we should talk about?
[18:57] <nth10sd> mschroeder: should your test matrix include 0.3.1 as well?
[18:58] <nth10sd> The "migration from" section under Test results matrix
[18:58] <mschroeder> hm... I can add this if you'll test it ;)
[19:00] <mschroeder> ctalbert: ^^^ what do you think about testing 0.3.1 -> 0.8 migration?
[19:01] <thetux> ctalbert: i can't find the bug in the moment, but there was something about canceling itip invitations doesn't work. is this fixed for RC1 ?
[19:03] <mschroeder> thetux: we don't support CANCEL in 0.8
[19:05] <mschroeder> nth10sd: I added 0.3.1 to the 0.3 column. Okay?
[19:05] <nth10sd> mschroeder: sure
[19:06] <mschroeder> Andreas and others: What about bug 419490? Do you think we should nominate it for blocking?
[19:06] <firebot> mschroeder: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419490 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, NS_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY exception when creating certain monthly repeating events
[19:07] <mschroeder> ssitter: you are the reporter. should this block the release?
[19:07] <ssitter> I'd rather group 0.3.1 together with 0.5; 0.3 had a different timezones set and database scheme
[19:08] <ssitter> mschroeder: There is a workaround, therefore we could live with it I think
[19:08] <mschroeder> ssitter: good point.
[19:08] <Andreas> +1
[19:08] <ctalbert> thetux: I think you're thinking of bug 419349
[19:09] <firebot> ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419349 nor, --, 0.8, ctalbert@mozilla.com, REOP, after landing of Bug 379198 decline button on imip-bar stopped working
[19:09] <ctalbert> thetux: we are waiting on good steps to reproduce the issue the reporter is seeing, we can't seem to see his errors
[19:09] <ssitter> however, I did not test if other applications might create such events and pass into sunbird/lightning
[19:10] <thetux> ctalbert: yes, this was the bug i read about
[19:11] <ctalbert> he put some steps in there
[19:11] <mschroeder> he used some extension
[19:11] <ctalbert> yeah I don't know why that would matter unless.
[19:11] <ctalbert> unless it does something wierd with the mimetype but even then if that were true he wouldn't have a decline button at all
[19:13] <mschroeder> don't know how to proceed with this issue
[19:13] <ctalbert> well, I'll go try it with his steps
[19:14] <mschroeder> okay, if you need my help, ping me
[19:14] <ctalbert> k thx
[19:15] <mschroeder> Any other bugs we should discuss?
[19:18] <mschroeder> So, that's the end of the QA chat. Thanks for attending, and have a nice evening/night/day. :)