Overview

Purpose

To define what we want to test to verify the work for Quantum DOM doesn't break the Web. Release criteria and/or aspirational performance gains we expect to achieve will be tracked elsewhere

Scope

• We will test by regular browsing and notable the Alexa top 100 and sites with resources on the tracking protection list
• Testing with some of the prefs for the Quantum DOM work varied will also be done

Ownership

Developers: :billm, :smaug, :ehsan, :bevis, :farre Manager: :overholt QA: Paul Oiegas, Carmen Făt (and others?)

Testing summary

Scope of Testing

In Scope

The interaction of foreground and background tabs. The behavior of pages that are loaded in background tabs (e.g. Push messages should still work; background XHR things should still function (think GMail auto-refresh)).

Out of Scope

Browser UI issues. Anything that happens in a non-Quantum DOM build (e.g. website breakage, odd layout issues). When in doubt: file a bug :)

Requirements for testing

Environments

All tier 1 desktop operating systems. A variety of hardware capabilities (e.g. a low-power netbook and a high-spec laptop or desktop) would be nice but is not required. There are some prefs that will need to be flipped. More info. forthcoming.

I NEED TO EDIT EVERYTHING BELOW THIS

Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups

Test Strategy

Test Objectives

This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.

Ref	Function	Test Objective	Evaluation Criteria	Test Type	Owners
1	Name of the feature or sub-function being tested	The objective the test is trying to demonstrate	The criteria that will be evaluated to demonstrate the test is successful	Manual/ Automation/ Regression/ Performance/ Usability/ Security/ Telemetry	Eng Team
2	Repeat for each feature/sub-function
3

Builds

This section should contain links for builds with the feature -

• Links for Nightly builds
• Links for Aurora builds
• Links for Beta builds

Test Execution Schedule

The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.

Project phase	Start Date	End Date
Start project
Study documentation/specs received from developers
QA - Test plan creation
QA - Test cases/Env preparation
QA - Nightly Testing
QA - Aurora Testing
QA - Beta Testing
Release Date

Testing Tools

Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:

Process	Tool
Test plan creation	Mozilla wiki
Test case creation	TestRail/ Google docs
Test case execution	TestRail
Bugs management	Bugzilla

Status

Overview

Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Aurora
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta

Risk analysis

Identify the high-risk assumptions
Identify existing bugs on the feature with high risk
Identify if other areas are affected by the fix

References

• List and links for specs

 List and links for available specs - documents, user stories, specifications

• Meta bug

Testcases

Overview

Summary of testing scenarios

Test Areas

Test Areas	Covered	Details
Private Window
Multi-Process Enabled
Multi-process Disabled
Theme (high contrast)
UI
Mouse-only operation
Keyboard-only operation
Display (HiDPI)
Interraction (scroll, zoom)
Usable with a screen reader		e.g. with NVDA
Usability and/or discoverability testing		Is this feature user friendly
RTL build testing
Help/Support
Help/support interface required		Make sure link to support/help page exist and is easy reachable.
Support documents planned(written)		Make sure support documents are written and are correct.
Install/Upgrade
Feature upgrades/downgrades data as expected
Does sync work across upgrades
Requires install testing		separate feature/application installation needed (not only Firefox)
Affects first-run or onboarding		Florin/Lawrence are investigating if there is a dedicated QA for this, or we should test? Should be an yes/no and if is yes should add in detail column the team/person assigned.
Does this affect partner builds? Partner build testing		yes/no options, add comment with details about who will lead testing
Enterprise		Raise up the topic to developers to see if they are expecting to work different on ESR builds
Enterprise administration
Network proxies/autoconfig
ESR behavior changes
Locked preferences
Data Monitoring
Temporary or permanent telemetry monitoring		List of error conditions to monitor
Telemetry correctness testing
Server integration testing
Offline and server failure testing
Load testing
Add-ons		If add-ons are available for testing feature, or is current feature will affect some add-ons, then API testing should be done for the add-on.
Addon API required?
Comprehensive API testing
Permissions
Testing with existing/popular addons
Security		Security is in charge of Matt Wobensmith. We should contact his team to see if security testing is necessary for current feature.
3rd-party security review
Privilege escalation testing
Fuzzing
Web Compatibility		depends on the feature
Testing against target sites
Survey of many sites for compatibility
Interoperability		depends on the feature
Common protocol/data format with other software: specification available. Interop testing with other common clients or servers.
Coordinated testing/interop across the Firefoxes: Desktop, Android, iOS
Interaction of this feature with other browser features

Test suite

Full Test suite - Link with the gdoc, follow the format from link
Smoke Test suite - Link with the gdoc, follow the format from link
Regression Test suite - Link with the gdoc - if available/needed.

Bug Work

Tracking bug – meta bug

Sign off

Criteria

Check list

• All test cases should be executed
• Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
• All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)

Results

Nightly testing

List of OSes that will be covered by testing

• Link for the tests run
  • Daily Smoke, use template from link
  • Full Test suite, use template from link
  • Regression Test suite, if needed/available

Merge to Aurora Sign-off List of OSes that will be covered by testing

• Link for the tests run
  • Full Test suite

Checklist

Exit Criteria	Status	Notes/Details
Testing Prerequisites (specs, use cases)
Testing Infrastructure setup
Test Plan Creation
Test Cases Creation
Full Functional Tests Execution
Automation Coverage
Performance Testing
All Defects Logged
Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified
Metrics/Telemetry
QA Signoff - Nightly Release		Email to be sent
QA Aurora - Full Testing
QA Signoff - Aurora Release		Email to be sent
QA Beta - Full Testing
QA Signoff - Beta Release		Email to be sent